aqua vs Qase

Can the hip tool keep up?

ā–¶Page updated — March 13, 2026

Launched in late 2020, Qase is the latest test management solution to get notable traction. It had a very modern interface and surprisingly mature UX from day one. Still, what exactly do they lack that an established TMS has? Find out, section by section, in just 10 minutes.

Key differences between aqua and Qase

aqua brings actana AI for test case generation, test data creation, and requirements with no credit caps

aqua offers On-Premise and Private Cloud deployment

aqua includes configurable workflows, shared views, and KPI Alerts on every paid plan

AI

AI is a rapidly developing technology, so we look at cutting-edge capabilities rather than the bare minimum. A mature AI layer in a test management solution should go well beyond simple text generation. Here is what to expect from a tool genuinely built for AI-powered QA:

  • Generate full test cases from plain text descriptions or requirements documents
  • Create test data automatically to populate and run your tests
  • Generate and edit requirements with AI assistance
  • Update existing tests automatically after a requirement changes
  • Operate without monthly credit limits or bandwidth restrictions

aqua’s actana AI is included in every paid plan across all three modules: Test Management, Requirement Management, and Defect Management. It covers test case generation, test data creation, requirements generation, and content editing with no credit caps or bandwidth restrictions. Qase’s AIDEN AI is available on all paid tiers but operates on a monthly credit model: 1,000 credits per month on Startup, 2,000 on Business, and 4,000 on Enterprise. AIDEN’s core strength is converting manual tests into automated ones and running them fully in Qase’s cloud with no infrastructure setup required. Both tools are production-grade, but aqua offers broader coverage across the full QA lifecycle without usage restrictions attached to any plan.

Qase logo
actana AI for test case generation (all paid plans)
AIDEN: generate test cases from requirements (all paid plans)
actana AI for test data creation (all paid plans)
AIDEN: convert manual tests to automated tests
actana AI for requirements generation (RM module)
AIDEN: automated test analysis and grading
actana AI for editing and enhancing content
AIDEN: works with Jira, GitHub, and directly in-app
No credit limits or monthly caps
Monthly credit limits: 1,000 / 2,000 / 4,000 per plan
No AI-driven test-to-automation conversion
AIDEN runs automated tests fully in Qase's cloud
actana AI for test case generation (all paid plans)
actana AI for test data creation (all paid plans)
actana AI for requirements generation (RM module)
actana AI for editing and enhancing content
No credit limits or monthly caps
No AI-driven test-to-automation conversion
Qase logo
AIDEN: generate test cases from requirements (all paid plans)
AIDEN: convert manual tests to automated tests
AIDEN: automated test analysis and grading
AIDEN: works with Jira, GitHub, and directly in-app
Monthly credit limits: 1,000 / 2,000 / 4,000 per plan
AIDEN runs automated tests fully in Qase's cloud

Verdict: aqua wins by offering unrestricted actana AI across all modules with no credit caps. AIDEN leads specifically on test automation conversion.

Test management

Test management is the core reason most teams evaluate these tools. A complete solution needs to handle not just test case creation and execution, but also the workflows, visibility, and compliance features that keep larger projects under control. The following capabilities define a mature test management platform

  • Create, execute, share, and manage test cases in a unified workspace
  • Group tests into scenarios, segment into folders, and assign custom labels
  • Navigate the test suite quickly with filters, individual views, and shared team views
  • Access the full execution history for every test case
  • Store a complete audit log of item changes for compliance purposes
  • Visualise requirements coverage and dependencies across test cases

aqua and Qase both offer solid foundations: test cases, test plans, custom fields, execution history, and change logs. Qase adds its own query language for advanced filtering and a test case review workflow from the Business plan upward. aqua includes configurable workflows, shared views, test case parametrisation, and adaptive field logic on all paid plans, making these efficiency features available to every team regardless of plan tier. aqua also provides real-time two-way Jira project sync, going beyond a basic integration.

Qase logo
Test cases, test scenarios, bulk edits, custom fields
Test cases, test plans, test runs, custom fields
Full execution history
Full execution history
Quick navigation and filters
Qase Query Language for advanced filtering
Item change history and audit log
Item change history
Configurable workflows (all paid plans)
No configurable workflows
Shared views (all paid plans)
Test case review: Business plan and above only
Adaptive field logic
Global shared steps (all paid plans)
Test case parametrisation
Requirements traceability: Business plan and above
Test cases, test scenarios, bulk edits, custom fields
Full execution history
Quick navigation and filters
Item change history and audit log
Configurable workflows (all paid plans)
Shared views (all paid plans)
Adaptive field logic
Test case parametrisation
Qase logo
Test cases, test plans, test runs, custom fields
Full execution history
Qase Query Language for advanced filtering
Item change history
No configurable workflows
Test case review: Business plan and above only
Global shared steps (all paid plans)
Requirements traceability: Business plan and above
Verdict: aqua wins by offering configurable workflows and shared views on all paid plans, without locking core efficiency features behind a higher tier.

Integrations

Most QA teams depend on a stack of tools that have been in use for years. A test management solution needs to connect to that stack natively rather than forcing workarounds through a generic API alone. Genuine integration depth means more than just a REST endpoint. Key criteria include:

  • Native integrations with test automation frameworks and tools
  • Jira integration with real-time synchronisation
  • REST API for connecting any additional tooling
  • CI/CD and developer ecosystem integrations

aqua offers 14+ native integrations covering the established QA automation stack: Jira, Jenkins, Confluence, JMeter, PowerShell, Database MSSQL, UnixShell, SoapUI, Ranorex, Database Oracle, REST API, Azure DevOps, UFT, and Selenium. Jira integration includes real-time two-way project sync. aqua Capture, a native bug recording and reporting tool, is included in all paid plans. Qase focuses on the developer ecosystem with 35+ integrations including GitHub, GitLab, Cypress, Playwright, Azure DevOps, Slack, Asana, monday.com, ClickUp, Linear, and YouTrack, plus REST API and webhooks from the Startup plan. Qase does not offer a comparable screen capture tool.

Qase logo
14+ native integrations including REST API
35+ integrations across the developer ecosystem
Jira with real-time two-way project sync
Jira with live two-way sync
Jenkins, JMeter, SoapUI, Ranorex, Selenium, UFT
Cypress, Playwright, GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps
Database MSSQL, Database Oracle
Slack, Asana, monday.com, ClickUp, Linear, YouTrack
PowerShell, UnixShell, Confluence
Webhooks from Startup plan
aqua Capture for bug recording (all paid plans)
No native screen capture tool
14+ native integrations including REST API
Jira with real-time two-way project sync
Jenkins, JMeter, SoapUI, Ranorex, Selenium, UFT
Database MSSQL, Database Oracle
PowerShell, UnixShell, Confluence
aqua Capture for bug recording (all paid plans)
Qase logo
35+ integrations across the developer ecosystem
Jira with live two-way sync
Cypress, Playwright, GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps
Slack, Asana, monday.com, ClickUp, Linear, YouTrack
Webhooks from Startup plan
No native screen capture tool
Verdict: aqua wins on native QA automation tool depth; Qase wins on breadth of developer ecosystem integrations. aqua Capture has no Qase equivalent.

Pricing flexibility

Pricing structure matters as much as the headline number. A tool that hides essential features behind its most expensive tier, or charges full price for every type of user, can quickly become costly at scale. Key things to evaluate are:

  • Transparent per-module pricing without bundling features you do not need
  • Monthly billing option without forcing annual commitment
  • Free or lower-cost licences for stakeholders and lighter users
  • Custom Enterprise plan for larger organisations

aqua uses modular per-product pricing. The Test Management and Requirement Management modules are each €89/month per user (billed annually) or €119/month (billed monthly). The Test Runner DEV add-on licence is €19/month (annual), designed for developers and QA specialists who execute tests but are not involved in test or requirement management. Free unlimited Guest seats are included in every plan. Qase prices in USD: the Business plan is $30/user/month (annual) or $36/month (monthly). Both offer a 20% annual discount and free read-only access. Qase also provides a free plan for up to 3 users and a 14-day free trial. aqua has no free plan but offers a free demo and free Guest licences on every plan. aqua’s modular structure lets teams purchase only the modules they actually need.

Qase logo
Monthly billing available
Monthly billing available
Free Guest licences with unlimited seats
Free plan for up to 3 users
Test Runner DEV licence at €19/month for lighter access
Read-only users at $2 to $5/month
TM and RM modules at €89/month per user (annual)
Business plan at $30/user/month (annual)
Modular pricing: TM, RM purchased separately
All-in-one pricing only
Free demo available
14-day free trial, no credit card required
Custom Enterprise plan
Custom Enterprise plan
20% annual discount
20% annual discount
No free plan
Free plan for up to 3 users
Monthly billing available
Free Guest licences with unlimited seats
Test Runner DEV licence at €19/month for lighter access
TM and RM modules at €89/month per user (annual)
Modular pricing: TM, RM purchased separately
Free demo available
Custom Enterprise plan
20% annual discount
No free plan
Qase logo
Monthly billing available
Free plan for up to 3 users
Read-only users at $2 to $5/month
Business plan at $30/user/month (annual)
All-in-one pricing only
14-day free trial, no credit card required
Custom Enterprise plan
20% annual discount
Free plan for up to 3 users

Verdict: aqua wins by modular pricing and free unlimited Guest seats at every tier. Qase wins by offering a free plan and a free trial for teams that want to test before committing.

Deployment Models

Deployment flexibility is a hard requirement in regulated industries such as banking, insurance, government, and healthcare. Many vendors avoid publishing their deployment limitations clearly, so it is worth verifying before committing. Here is what to check:

  • Vendor-managed Cloud hosting with GDPR compliance
  • Dedicated or isolated Cloud environment for Enterprise customers
  • On-Premise installation within your own infrastructure

aqua has offered On-Premise deployment since its first release and continues to provide it under the aqua Suite Enterprise plan alongside Private Cloud. Qase explicitly states on its product page that it does not offer a self-hosted or on-premise version. Qase Enterprise customers can access a dedicated cluster hosted within a private virtual private cloud, which provides additional isolation while remaining a fully managed cloud environment.

Qase logo
On-Premise (aqua Suite / Enterprise)
No On-Premise or self-hosted option
GDPR-compliant aqua-hosted Cloud
Qase-hosted Cloud (AWS)
Private Cloud or Dedicated Cloud (Enterprise)
Dedicated Cluster / Private VPC (Enterprise, paid add-on)
SSO via SAML or LDAP (Enterprise)
SSO via SAML 2.0 (Enterprise only)
On-Premise (aqua Suite / Enterprise)
GDPR-compliant aqua-hosted Cloud
Private Cloud or Dedicated Cloud (Enterprise)
SSO via SAML or LDAP (Enterprise)
Qase logo
No On-Premise or self-hosted option
Qase-hosted Cloud (AWS)
Dedicated Cluster / Private VPC (Enterprise, paid add-on)
SSO via SAML 2.0 (Enterprise only)
Verdict: aqua wins outright. On-Premise is a first-class deployment option; Qase explicitly does not offer it and has no equivalent.

Dashboards

QA dashboards serve two purposes simultaneously. They help the QA team track their own progress day to day, and they give other teams and stakeholders visibility into quality health without requiring access to the full tool. A strong dashboard layer should cover:

  • Display any workspace data, not just a predefined widget set
  • Support both private and team-shared dashboards
  • Offer a variety of chart and visualisation types
  • Trigger KPI alerts when a metric crosses a threshold

aqua offers fully custom dashboards across all paid plans, drawing on any data from the workspace, and includes KPI Alerts that notify users when a metric moves above or below a defined threshold. Qase offers widgetized dashboards from the Startup plan upward, covering coverage, pass rates, failure trends, flakiness, and cycle time. Qase dashboards are shareable via read-only seats. Both tools make dashboards accessible without requiring a higher-tier plan, but aqua’s KPI Alert capability has no equivalent in Qase and provides proactive rather than reactive quality monitoring.

Qase logo
Any workspace data on dashboards
Coverage, pass rates, failure trends, flakiness, cycle time
KPI Alerts with threshold notifications
No KPI Alerts
Custom dashboards (all paid plans)
Widgetized dashboards (Startup plan and above)
Shareable with stakeholders
Shareable via read-only seats
Any workspace data on dashboards
KPI Alerts with threshold notifications
Custom dashboards (all paid plans)
Shareable with stakeholders
Qase logo
Coverage, pass rates, failure trends, flakiness, cycle time
No KPI Alerts
Widgetized dashboards (Startup plan and above)
Shareable via read-only seats
Verdict: aqua wins by KPI Alerts and the ability to surface any workspace data rather than a predefined widget set.

Reporting

Reporting is the primary way QA communicates value to internal and external stakeholders. The difference between a useful report and a basic metrics export is significant at the project level. A mature reporting layer should give teams full control over structure, data, and presentation:

  • Pre-built report templates as a starting point
  • Fully custom layouts with drag-and-drop and formatting controls
  • Support for any workspace data, pivot tables, and scripts
  • External text, image, and data embedding for polished stakeholder reports

aqua provides a fully configurable reporting system including drag-and-drop layouts, pivot tables, custom scripts, parametrised reports, external text and image insertion, and both template-based and fully bespoke report creation. Reports can be shared externally with stakeholders outside the tool. Qase offers widgetized dashboards with quality metrics from the Startup plan but does not offer dedicated custom reporting, saved report templates, pivot tables, scripted automation, or purpose-built external report sharing. Teams that need to deliver structured QA reports to management, auditors, or clients will find aqua significantly more capable.

Qase logo
Pre-built report templates
Not available
Fully custom report layouts
Not available
Any workspace data
Dashboard-based metrics only
Text and image formatting in reports
Not available
Drag-and-drop report builder
Not available
Pivot tables
Not available
Scripts and parametrisation
Not available
External sharing of reports
Shareable via read-only seats
Pre-built report templates
Fully custom report layouts
Any workspace data
Text and image formatting in reports
Drag-and-drop report builder
Pivot tables
Scripts and parametrisation
External sharing of reports
Qase logo
Not available
Not available
Dashboard-based metrics only
Not available
Not available
Not available
Not available
Shareable via read-only seats
Verdict: aqua wins. Qase provides dashboards; aqua provides a full reporting suite capable of serving any internal or external stakeholder need.

User management

Granular user management protects data, enforces process, and reduces onboarding friction, regardless of whether compliance is the primary driver. For teams with mixed roles, contractors, or external reviewers, the ability to define exactly what each person can access matters. Key criteria include:

  • Default and custom role definitions without plan restrictions
  • Per-user permission overrides beyond role-level access
  • SSO for enterprise identity management
  • User provisioning and directory synchronisation

aqua includes granular roles and permissions on all paid plans, with custom roles available to every customer without a plan restriction. Per-user permission overrides go beyond role-level assignments. Qase adds role-based access control only from its Business plan and restricts SSO to Enterprise, though it can be purchased as a paid add-on at the Business tier. Qase Enterprise supports SCIM user provisioning; aqua Enterprise supports LDAP.

Qase logo
SSO via SAML or LDAP (Enterprise)
SSO via SAML 2.0 (Enterprise; paid add-on on Business)
Default user roles (all plans)
Default user roles (all plans)
Granular roles and permissions (all paid plans)
Role-based access control: Business plan and above only
Individual per-user permissions
Role-level permissions only
User provisioning via LDAP (Enterprise)
SCIM user provisioning (Enterprise)
SSO via SAML or LDAP (Enterprise)
Default user roles (all plans)
Granular roles and permissions (all paid plans)
Individual per-user permissions
User provisioning via LDAP (Enterprise)
Qase logo
SSO via SAML 2.0 (Enterprise; paid add-on on Business)
Default user roles (all plans)
Role-based access control: Business plan and above only
Role-level permissions only
SCIM user provisioning (Enterprise)
Verdict: aqua wins by making granular roles and individual per-user permissions available to all paid customers, not just those on Business or Enterprise tiers.

ALM

Full application lifecycle management in a single tool reduces vendor licences and keeps traceability intact across every stage of development. This is not a hard requirement for every team, but it delivers meaningful value when requirements and tests all live in the same system. Here is what a complete ALM offering covers:

  • Requirements management with AI assistance and coverage tracking
  • Test case management linked directly to requirements
  • Project and workflow management across the full team

aqua provides full ALM coverage through its three modules: Requirement Management, Test Management, and Defect Management. Each can be purchased individually or together. Qase includes requirements management from the Startup plan and covers the full lifecycle at a lower entry price point, though without the modular flexibility or configurable workflow depth of aqua.

Qase logo
Test case management (TM module)
Test case management (all plans)
Requirements management (RM module, €89/month annual)
Requirements management (Startup plan and above)
Defect management (included with TM and RM)
Defect management (all plans)
Project management and configurable workflows
Project management
Test case management (TM module)
Requirements management (RM module, €89/month annual)
Defect management (included with TM and RM)
Project management and configurable workflows
Qase logo
Test case management (all plans)
Requirements management (Startup plan and above)
Defect management (all plans)
Project management
Details verdict icon: Tie
Verdict: Tie. Both cover the full ALM lifecycle. aqua offers more modularity and workflow configuration; Qase makes the full lifecycle available at a lower entry price.

What people say

Here are a few things people like and dislike about both tools.

Qase logo
star star star star star

ā€œI was surprised to find such a comprehensive and mature tool for test management in the German market without having taken it seriously beforehand.ā€

Jörg Großmann

Head of Development at Bank 11

star star star

ā€œThe main thing which got us using Qase was their UX, which is way more convenient to use than most of the competition. There is room for improvement, such as reporting — especially cross-team reporting and building holistic views on how all projects are doing across the companyā€.

Mikko V.

Enterprise (>1,000 emp.)

star star star star star

ā€œThe reporting is meaningful and provides a good basis for decisions. After the employees have used aqua, they recognize the added value very quickly.ā€

Thomas Haeske

Head of Organisation/IT at Berlin Hyp

star star star

ā€œThere is one area where I feel Qase could improve: the process of writing test steps for similar cases. While the platform provides some tools to make this easier, writing out the same steps for multiple cases with similar characteristics can still be quite time-consuming and tediousā€œ.

Luka C.

Small business (<50 emp.)

star star star star star

ā€œManual test cases are easily automated with aqua. Seamless integration with test automation tools helps here.ā€

Jƶrn-Hendrick Sƶrensen

Test Manager at KBA

star star star

ā€œThere is a distinct lack of filters available on a test run level and on a test case level, e.g.: 1. Filter only the test runs which contain failing tests among thousands of test runs (triggered by automation) 2. Filter out test cases that no longer exist in the code (we deprecated and old feature and therefore removed the tests)ā€

Lee W.

Small business (<50 emp.)

star star star star star

ā€œI was surprised to find such a comprehensive and mature tool for test management in the German market without having taken it seriously beforehand.ā€

Jörg Großmann

Head of Development at Bank 11

star star star star star

ā€œThe reporting is meaningful and provides a good basis for decisions. After the employees have used aqua, they recognize the added value very quickly.ā€

Thomas Haeske

Head of Organisation/IT at Berlin Hyp

star star star star star

ā€œManual test cases are easily automated with aqua. Seamless integration with test automation tools helps here.ā€

Jƶrn-Hendrick Sƶrensen

Test Manager at KBA

Qase logo
star star star

ā€œThe main thing which got us using Qase was their UX, which is way more convenient to use than most of the competition. There is room for improvement, such as reporting — especially cross-team reporting and building holistic views on how all projects are doing across the companyā€.

Mikko V.

Enterprise (>1,000 emp.)

star star star

ā€œThere is one area where I feel Qase could improve: the process of writing test steps for similar cases. While the platform provides some tools to make this easier, writing out the same steps for multiple cases with similar characteristics can still be quite time-consuming and tediousā€œ.

Luka C.

Small business (<50 emp.)

star star star

ā€œThere is a distinct lack of filters available on a test run level and on a test case level, e.g.: 1. Filter only the test runs which contain failing tests among thousands of test runs (triggered by automation) 2. Filter out test cases that no longer exist in the code (we deprecated and old feature and therefore removed the tests)ā€

Lee W.

Small business (<50 emp.)

Final verdict

aqua is an established Enterprise-grade solution with modular pricing, mature custom reporting, On-Premise deployment, and unrestricted actana AI on every paid plan. Qase has grown significantly and is genuinely competitive for cloud-first, developer-adjacent teams, particularly with AIDEN's automation conversion capabilities and 35+ integrations. However, Qase still lacks custom reports, configurable workflows, granular per-user permissions below Business tier, and any on-premise deployment option.

Qase logo
actana AI for test case generation, test data, and requirements (no caps)
AIDEN AI: test generation and manual-to-automated conversion (credit-based)
Configurable workflows (all paid plans)
No configurable workflows
Shared views (all paid plans)
No shared views
Custom reports: templates, pivot tables, scripts
Dashboard-based metrics only
KPI Alerts on dashboards
No KPI Alerts
Individual per-user permissions (all paid plans)
Role-based access control from Business plan only
On-Premise deployment (aqua Suite / Enterprise)
Cloud only, no On-Premise option
14+ native integrations including QA automation tools
35+ developer ecosystem integrations
aqua Capture: native bug recording tool
No equivalent
Modular pricing: TM and RM at €89/month, Test Runner DEV at €19/month
All-in-one pricing only
Free unlimited Guest seats
Read-only users at $2 to $5/month
Free demo available
14-day free trial, no credit card required
No free plan
Free plan for up to 3 users
Monthly billing available
Monthly billing available
actana AI for test case generation, test data, and requirements (no caps)
Configurable workflows (all paid plans)
Shared views (all paid plans)
Custom reports: templates, pivot tables, scripts
KPI Alerts on dashboards
Individual per-user permissions (all paid plans)
On-Premise deployment (aqua Suite / Enterprise)
14+ native integrations including QA automation tools
aqua Capture: native bug recording tool
Modular pricing: TM and RM at €89/month, Test Runner DEV at €19/month
Free unlimited Guest seats
Free demo available
No free plan
Monthly billing available
Qase logo
AIDEN AI: test generation and manual-to-automated conversion (credit-based)
No configurable workflows
No shared views
Dashboard-based metrics only
No KPI Alerts
Role-based access control from Business plan only
Cloud only, no On-Premise option
35+ developer ecosystem integrations
No equivalent
All-in-one pricing only
Read-only users at $2 to $5/month
14-day free trial, no credit card required
Free plan for up to 3 users
Monthly billing available

FAQ

How do aqua and Qase compare across pricing, user satisfaction, and features?

aqua’s Test Management and Requirement Management modules are each €89/month per user (annual), with a Test Runner DEV add-on at €19/month and free unlimited Guest seats included on every plan. Qase’s Business plan is $30/user/month (annual) or $36/month (monthly). Both offer 20% annual discounts. aqua offers a free demo and free Guest licences; Qase offers a 14-day free trial and a free plan for up to 3 users.

Which AI test automation capabilities differ between aqua and Qase?

aqua delivers actana AI for test case generation, test data creation, and requirements generation on all paid plans with no credit restrictions. Qase’s AIDEN AI covers test generation and manual-to-automated test conversion, operating on monthly credits that vary by plan tier from 1,000 to 4,000 per month.

What distinguishes reporting and dashboards in aqua compared to Qase?

aqua provides a full custom reporting suite including drag-and-drop templates, pivot tables, scripts, and parametrisation, alongside custom dashboards with KPI Alerts. Qase offers widgetized dashboards with quality metrics but has no dedicated custom reporting functionality, no saved report templates, and no KPI Alert system.

How do aqua and Qase differ in deployment options?

aqua supports cloud and On-Premise deployment, making it suitable for regulated industries with strict data residency requirements. Qase is cloud-only and explicitly states it has no self-hosted or on-premise version. Qase Enterprise offers a dedicated cluster for additional isolation within their managed cloud.

Do aqua and Qase both offer granular user permissions?

aqua includes granular roles and individual per-user permissions on all paid plans. Qase adds role-based access control from its Business plan ($30/user/month annual) and restricts SSO to Enterprise, with an option to purchase it as a paid add-on on Business.