Test Automation Best practices Test Management
11 min read
December 7, 2025

Jenkins Review 2026: Is It Still a Good Choice for CI/CD?

Jenkins software is everywhere. If you've been in DevOps or QA for more than five minutes, you've heard the name. It's the automation server everyone seems to use. The one with more plugins than you can count. The one that just keeps showing up in job descriptions. But popularity doesn't always equal "perfect for you." In this Jenkins review, we're breaking down what makes this CI/CD tool tick, and help you figure out if Jenkins belongs in your testing toolkit.

photo
photo
Paul Elsner
Nurlan Suleymanov

Key takeaways

  • Jenkins commands roughly 44% of the CI/CD market share through its open-source automation server that offers maximum customization and flexibility for complex workflows.
  • The plugin ecosystem includes over 1,800 plugins that extend functionality across virtually any technology stack, making Jenkins adaptable to diverse environments.
  • Jenkins Pipeline allows teams to define entire CI/CD processes as code using Jenkinsfiles stored in version control, enabling reproducible and transparent automation.
  • While Jenkins is free to use, hidden costs include infrastructure expenses, maintenance overhead, plugin compatibility issues, and the need for dedicated DevOps expertise.
  • Organizations choose Jenkins over newer platforms primarily when they need hybrid deployments, specialized hardware integration, complex build dependencies, or custom workflows for legacy systems.

Jenkins offers unmatched flexibility for CI/CD pipelines, but requires significant technical expertise to maintain effectively. Is the trade-off between customization and complexity worth it for your team? Find out below šŸ‘‡

What is Jenkins Software?

Jenkins is an open-source automation server built on Java and the JVM. It’s become synonymous with continuous integration and continuous delivery pipelines. This build automation tool automates the repetitive grunt work. Building, testing, and deploying code. So your QA team can catch bugs before they sneak into production.

The tool operates on a pipeline methodology. You define your entire software development lifecycle as code. From the moment someone commits changes to the final production deployment.

What is Jenkins software exactly? It’s a continuous integration tool Jenkins users rely on for its master-agent architecture. Sometimes called controller-agent setup. The master node orchestrates jobs and manages the overall pipeline. Agent nodes handle the actual build and test execution across distributed machines.

This setup lets teams scale horizontally. Spin up more agents when you need extra firepower. Scale back when things are quiet.

Around 32,750 verified companies use this continuous integration tool. It commands roughly 44% of the CI/CD market share. An estimated 11.26 million developers rely on it globally.

Compared to newer CI/CD tools like GitLab CI or CircleCI, Jenkins gives you maximum control and customization. But it requires more hands-on configuration.

The Jenkins CI/CD tool processes tasks through jobs and builds. A job is essentially a task you want Jenkins to perform. Running unit tests, compiling code, or deploying to staging. Builds are individual executions of those jobs. Tracked with detailed logs and results. Pipelines tie everything together. You chain multiple jobs into automated workflows. They respond to triggers like code commits or scheduled intervals.

As Jenkins tackles automation for your build and deployment processes, it raises the question: how are you managing the test cases that validate your software’s quality? While Jenkins excels at CI/CD orchestration, it’s not designed for comprehensive test management. This is where aqua cloud steps in seamlessly. Like Jenkins, aqua offers robust integration capabilities, but specifically focuses on centralizing all your test assets, both manual and automated, into one unified platform. With aqua’s dedicated Jenkins plugin, you can trigger Jenkins jobs directly from aqua and have test results automatically fed back into aqua’s powerful reporting dashboards, creating a perfect bridge between your CI/CD pipeline and test management processes. Now enhanced with aqua’s domain-trained AI Copilot, you can generate test cases, documentation, and test data in seconds, all contextually relevant to your specific project needs.

Save up to 43% of your testing time while maintaining complete CI/CD integration with aqua cloud

Try aqua for free

Key Features of Jenkins

Jenkins stands out because of its massive plugin ecosystem, consisting of over 1,800 plugins. They extend functionality across virtually every technology stack you can imagine.

Need to integrate with Docker? There’s a plugin. Want to connect Jenkins with Kubernetes for dynamic agent provisioning? Covered. This extensibility means you’re not locked into a vendor’s opinionated workflow.

Pipeline as Code

Jenkins Pipeline is where the magic happens. Instead of clicking through a web UI to configure builds, you write your entire pipeline as code. Using a domain-specific language (DSL) stored in Jenkinsfiles.

These files live right in your version control. Your CI/CD setup is versioned, reviewable, and reproducible.

Multi branch, for everything. Using trunk based git branching strategy the build/deployment is so much easier to manage. That along with the pipeline display plugins. It’s really nice to be able to visualize a downstream build. Jenkins to Jira has been great as well.

Deadlychambers Posted in Reddit

It sounds great on paper. For many teams, it is. But here’s where it gets tricky. Those Jenkinsfiles are written in Groovy. And Groovy isn’t exactly the most approachable language.

"Jenkins uses their own DSL for configuring their job script, which has a high learning curve and is not the most intuitive."

Senior Software Development Engineer Posted in Capterra

Distributed Architecture & Scalability

Scalability is another huge strength. The distributed build architecture lets you spin up multiple agent nodes. Across different machines, operating systems, or even cloud regions.

Large projects with heavy test suites can parallelize execution across dozens of agents simultaneously. It slashes build times from hours to minutes.

The Jenkins build automation tool also shines with its multibranch pipeline support. The automation server automatically detects branches in your repository. It creates independent pipelines for each one. Feature branches get their own build and test pipeline. It is isolated from the main codebase.

Plugin Ecosystem

Jenkins has over 1,800 plugins. Covering everything from source control to deployment to notifications. These plugins transform Jenkins from a basic build server into a comprehensive automation platform. It integrates with virtually any tool in your DevOps stack.

"Configuration as code plugin is highly recommended."

Vildand Posted in Reddit

Popular plugins include the Kubernetes plugin for dynamic agent provisioning and the Docker plugin for container support. Also, there are version control integrations with GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket.

For plugin ecosystem insights, relying on community feedback and continuing development is critical to maintaining Jenkins’ flexibility.

You’re essentially trusting community-maintained plugins for critical parts of your workflow. When a plugin breaks or stops being maintained, you’re stuck debugging. Or finding alternatives.

Security & Access Control

Security and access control features are built in. Jenkins offers role-based access control (RBAC). Integration with LDAP and Active Directory. Encryption for sensitive data like API keys and credentials.

For teams working in regulated industries or managing complex permission structures, these built-in security features mean you’re not bolting on authentication as an afterthought.

Is Jenkins Free? Understanding the Real Cost

Yes. Jenkins is free and open-source under the MIT License. No licensing fees. No surprise bills. Just download and run. For small teams or open-source projects, this is huge.

However, the true Jenkins cost includes infrastructure expenses you can’t ignore. While the software itself has no price or licensing fees, operational costs can be significant.

One example: a typical enterprise AWS setup with 60 controller instances can run about $16,200 per month. That’s for compute, storage, and data transfer. Then add the time your team spends maintaining it.

When people ask about Jenkins pricing,Ā this operational cost is what really matters. Understanding the true Jenkins cost is critical when budgeting for your CI/CD infrastructure.

Note: While Jenkins company (the open-source project) doesn’t charge licensing fees, organizations like CloudBees offer managed Jenkins solutions with enterprise support.

What Users Love About Jenkins

Despite the challenges, Jenkins has die-hard fans. Let’s look at why people stick with it.

jenkins-strengths-in-cicd-workflows

Maximum Flexibility

If you have a weird, non-standard workflow, Jenkins can probably handle it. The combination of plugins and scriptability means you can bend it to fit almost any use case.

This flexibility is why so many enterprises with legacy systems still rely on Jenkins. It doesn’t force you into a specific way of working.

Battle-Tested Reliability

Jenkins has been around since 2011. Its predecessor Hudson even longer. It’s been tested in production at massive scale for years. When properly configured, it’s stable and reliable.

Companies like NASA, Microsoft, and Ubisoft have used it to power critical builds.

Active Community Support

The massive community means you’ll find answers to pretty much any problem you encounter. Forums, Stack Overflow, and community-contributed plugins provide solutions. Solutions that have been battle-tested by thousands of teams.

What Users Complain About

Now for the pain points. These are the issues that come up repeatedly in Jenkins reviews.

Steep Learning Curve

Getting Jenkins set up properly takes time and expertise. It’s not a “install and go” experience.

"Jenkins historically has been an operational nightmare. But I will die on the hill of saying it is still the most powerful out of all the CI offerings."

Anonymous Posted in Reddit

For teams without dedicated DevOps engineers, this can be a major barrier.

Plugin Management Hell

Managing 1,800+ plugins gets messy fast.

"A huge number of plugins are abandonware and building a sane immutable jenkins env can be challenging."

N3rden Posted in Reddit

When plugins conflict or break, debugging becomes a nightmare. Error messages are often cryptic. You’re left googling obscure error codes at 2 AM.

Dated User Interface

Let’s be honest: Jenkins looks old. The interface hasn’t kept up with modern design standards.

"Devs hate the UI, blue ocean is okayish. Developing often uses an abomination of a custom DSL language on groovy which is really annoying to test. If you don't start with strict ci code standards from the beginning, in a few years your CI code will become an untestable mess."

Anonymous Posted in Reddit

Navigation can feel clunky. Especially when you’re managing dozens of jobs across multiple projects. For teams used to sleek, modern UIs, Jenkins can feel like a step backward.

Performance Issues at Scale

That single-server architecture we mentioned? It bites you eventually. The main Jenkins controller becomes a bottleneck. You’re left scrambling to set up distributed agents.

You can work around this with distributed agents. But that adds complexity. And complexity means more things that can break.

Security Patch Delays

Jenkins security updates need to be manually applied. They don’t auto-install. You’re responsible for staying on top of patches.

Where Jenkins Fits in Your Testing Stack

Here’s something important: Jenkins is a CI/CD tool, not a test management solution. It executes your tests. But it doesn’t manage them. Understanding these CI/CD challenges helps you see where Jenkins shines and where it needs support.

What Jenkins does: Runs your automated test suites. Reports pass/fail. Integrates with your CI/CD pipeline.

What Jenkins doesn’t do: Organize test cases. Link tests to requirements. Provide traceability. Manage test planning. Or give you comprehensive test coverage visibility.

This is where pairing Jenkins with a proper test management solution makes sense. Our successful DevOps case studies show how teams combine automation with intelligent test management.

Tools like aqua cloud fill the gaps Jenkins leaves open. While Jenkins handles the execution, aqua handles the planning, organization, and traceability.

Think of it this way: Jenkins is your automation engine. But you still need something to manage what you’re automating. Track coverage. Ensure nothing falls through the cracks. That’s where test management comes in.

The Jenkins + aqua Integration

The good news? Jenkins and aqua cloud work together seamlessly through our Jenkins integration.

You can trigger Jenkins builds directly from aqua. Link test executions back to test cases. Maintain full traceability from requirements through execution.

Your test cases live in aqua. You can use AI to generate them in seconds. Organize them by feature. Link them to requirements. Then Jenkins executes those tests as part of your pipeline. The results flow back to aqua for reporting and analysis.

This approach supports modern continuous testing practices that keep quality high without slowing down delivery.

It’s the best of both worlds. Jenkins’ automation power combined with aqua’s intelligent test management. Check out our complete plugin ecosystem insights to see how aqua connects with your entire DevOps toolchain.

Jenkins Alternatives

Let’s be honest about where Jenkins stands in 2026.

GitHub Actions has eaten a lot of Jenkins’ lunch for teams already on GitHub. Setup is easier. The UI is modern. Integration is seamless. But it’s GitHub-only. And advanced customization is limited.

GitLab CI/CD offers similar advantages for GitLab users. It’s integrated, clean, and doesn’t require plugin management. But again, you’re locked into the GitLab ecosystem.

CircleCI is fast and cloud-native with excellent Docker support. But it’s proprietary. And costs can escalate quickly.

Jenkins still wins on flexibility and cost (if you ignore operational expenses). If you have complex, custom workflows or legacy systems, Jenkins might still be your best bet. But if you’re starting fresh with a modern cloud-native architecture, you might find better options.

The Verdict: Is Jenkins Worth It in 2026?

Here’s the straight answer: it depends on what you need.

Jenkins is still worth it if you:

  • Need maximum control and customization
  • Have complex, non-standard workflows
  • Run hybrid on-premise and cloud environments
  • Maintain legacy systems that Jenkins integrates with well
  • Have the DevOps expertise to manage it properly

Consider alternatives if you:

  • Want quick setup and modern UX
  • Are all-in on cloud-native architectures
  • Need better out-of-box experience
  • Have limited DevOps resources
  • Prioritize developer experience over flexibility

And regardless of which CI/CD tool you choose, pair it with proper test management. Jenkins (or any automation server) is only as good as the tests you feed it. Without organized test cases, requirements traceability, and intelligent test planning, you’re just running tests in the dark.

Note: While Jenkins company (the open-source project) doesn’t charge licensing fees, organizations like CloudBees offer managed Jenkins solutions with enterprise support. When reading Jenkins reviews across platforms, you’ll see this free-vs-operational-cost debate come up repeatedly.

That’s where aqua cloud becomes essential. It doesn’t replace Jenkins. It makes Jenkins better by ensuring you’re testing the right things. Tracking coverage. Maintaining visibility across your entire quality process.

Conclusion

Jenkins has earned its place in DevOps history. It’s powerful, flexible, and free. But it’s not perfect. The dated UI, plugin maintenance burden, and operational complexity are real issues you’ll need to deal with. The question is “Is Jenkins right for my team’s specific needs?” If you value flexibility above all else and have the expertise to manage it, yes. If you want modern UX and easy setup, maybe not. And whether you choose Jenkins or something else, don’t forget the test management piece. Your CI/CD pipeline is only as good as the tests it runs. Those tests need proper organization, traceability, and management. That’s what separates teams that just run tests from teams that actually improve quality.

aqua cloud completes the picture by bringing comprehensive test management into your DevOps workflow. With aqua’s bidirectional Jenkins integration, you can trigger automated test execution directly from your test management system, collect results from any test format (including JUnit XML from tools like Playwright and Cypress), and generate powerful analytics dashboards that provide complete visibility into your quality metrics. Unlike the maintenance overhead Jenkins requires, aqua delivers enterprise-grade functionality with minimal setup and administration. aqua’s domain-trained AI Copilot further accelerates your testing workflow by generating project-specific test cases, requirements, and test data in seconds, all while maintaining security and context awareness that generic AI tools can’t match. Whether you’re managing complex test suites across hybrid environments or streamlining your cloud-based testing, aqua connects directly to your Jenkins pipelines while eliminating the “configuration maze” challenge.

Achieve 100% test coverage and reduce testing time by up to 97% with aqua's AI-powered test management platform

Try aqua for free
On this page:
See more
Speed up your releases x2 with aqua
Start for free
step

FOUND THIS HELPFUL? Share it with your QA community

FAQ

What is Jenkins software used for?

Jenkins software is a continuous integration tool used to automate building, testing, and deploying applications. It monitors your code repository. Automatically runs tests when changes are detected. Can deploy successful builds to various environments. The Jenkins CI CD tool handles the entire pipeline from code commit to production deployment.

Is Jenkins free to use?

Is Jenkins free? Yes. Jenkins is completely free and open-source under the MIT License. However, the true Jenkins cost includes infrastructure expenses. Servers, storage, networking. Maintenance time. Personnel costs.

While the software itself has no Jenkins price or licensing fees, operational costs can be significant. Enterprise teams often spend $10,000-$20,000+ monthly on infrastructure alone.

Why is Jenkins outdated?

Jenkins feels outdated primarily due to its user interface. It hasn’t kept pace with modern design standards. The reliance on Groovy scripting. Complex plugin management. Lack of built-in cloud-native features make it feel old compared to tools like GitHub Actions or GitLab CI.

However, “outdated” doesn’t mean “ineffective.” It’s still widely used and actively maintained.

Is Jenkins still relevant in 2025?

Yes. Jenkins is still relevant in 2025 for specific use cases. It excels at complex, customized workflows. Legacy system integration. Scenarios requiring maximum control. About 11.26 million developers still rely on Jenkins globally.

However, for greenfield cloud-native projects, newer alternatives often provide better developer experience with less operational overhead.

What are the downsides of Jenkins?

Main downsides include:

  • Steep learning curve and complex setup
  • Dated user interface that feels clunky
  • Plugin management challenges (1,800+ plugins, many poorly maintained)
  • Hidden operational costs despite being free software
  • Manual security patch management
  • Single-controller bottleneck at scale (around 100 concurrent jobs)
  • Groovy-based pipeline syntax that’s verbose and complex

What is replacing Jenkins?

Common Jenkins alternatives include GitHub Actions (for GitHub-hosted projects), GitLab CI/CD (integrated platform approach), CircleCI (cloud-native, fast), Azure DevOps (Microsoft ecosystem), and Bitbucket Pipelines (Atlassian suite). However, “replacing” overstates it. Many organizations still choose Jenkins tool for its flexibility. Modern alternatives offer better UX but less customization.

Why are companies moving away from Jenkins?

Companies move away from Jenkins automation server primarily due to maintenance burden (managing plugins, updates, and infrastructure requires dedicated resources), talent gap (finding Jenkins experts is harder than those familiar with GitHub Actions), and cloud-native alignment (modern CI/CD tools integrate better with Kubernetes). Developer experience is another factor as newer tools offer simpler setup and more intuitive interfaces. While free, operational costs often exceed managed alternatives, though many enterprises continue using Jenkins successfully.

How can Jenkins be integrated with modern DevOps toolchains?

Jenkins tool integrates with modern DevOps toolchains through its extensive plugin ecosystem and APIs. Key integrations include version control (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket), container orchestration (Docker, Kubernetes), cloud providers (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud), communication tools (Slack, Microsoft Teams), and artifact management (Artifactory, Nexus). For Jenkins software development workflows, the platform supports Pipeline as Code, webhook triggers, dynamic agent provisioning in containers, and API-driven automation.

What best practices improve Jenkins pipeline reliability and performance?

To enhance Jenkins automation server reliability, use Pipeline as Code with Jenkinsfiles stored in version control and limit plugins to essential, well-maintained ones with regular security updates. Implement distributed controller-agent setup using Docker or Kubernetes for dynamic agents, and separate build and deployment environments. Set up logging and alerting with regular backups of Jenkins home directory, and schedule maintenance windows for updates. Connect with test management systems and implement proper continuous testing practices to avoid common CI/CD pitfalls.