Browser-based AI operators
Automation Best practices Management Agile
13 mins read
March 27, 2025

Browser-based AI operators for test automation

Letā€™s cut to the chase: traditional test automation is far from being perfect. Itā€™s expensive, brittle, and requires a small army of engineers to maintain. Now, imagine if there was a solution to fix most of these problems. Yes, it is possible and we are talking about browser-based AI operators - the self-driving cars of QA.

photo
photo
Sylwia Mazepa
Nurlan Suleymanov

Apart from automating tests, they think, adapt, and even heal themselves when things go wrong. But before you start seeing a utopia where bots do all the work, letā€™s get real and cover these operators from both positive and negative aspects.

What is an AI Operator? (And Why Should You Care?)

You can imagine an AI operator inside your computer like a QA engineer. Using machine learning and computer vision, it interacts with web applications just like you would. 

Need to test a login flow? Instead of writing 50 lines of Selenium code, you tell the AI: 

ā€œLog in as a user with invalid credentials and see what happens.ā€ 

Then the operator goes and:

  • Navigates the UI
  • Clicks buttons, 
  • Fills forms
  • Even interprets error messages.

But it doesnā€™t rely on XPaths or CSS selectors. It sees the screen like a human, which means it can handle UI changes effortlessly. Imagine your dev team pushes a last-minute button redesign. Instead of your automation suite failing, the AI justā€¦ figures it out.

"After experimenting with LLMs, we discovered they can be really good at browsing and using websites like real users. In our previous jobs we've never had a proper end-to-end testing automation and mainly relied on manual testing and users feedback."

Ticaragua Posted in Everything DevOps Reddit thread, 7 months ago">Reddit

The Future of Web Test Automation: Manual QA Win, Automation QA Adapt

Letā€™s start visioning where we are now with test automation:

We need to get one thing straight: AI operators arenā€™t here to replace humans (not yet). Theyā€™re here to make humans more powerful. According to a study, by the end of 2025, AI copilot functionality will be used in nearly 100% of roles across the SDLC. Bold prediction, but not far from reality. If not 2025, it will be a maximum of 2-3 years before it happens. 

For QA, this means manual testers can now automate tests without writing a single line of code.

But for automation engineers, the story is different. If your job is writing Selenium scripts, you need to start upskilling. AI operators donā€™t need scriptsā€”they need prompts. Instead of coding, youā€™ll be: 

  • Guiding the AI
  • Setting boundaries 
  • Interpreting results 

So itā€™s less about technical expertise and more about strategic thinking (in this case, prompt engineering). If you love the technical aspect of your job more than the strategic part, then you need to lock in, find the gaps and inconsistencies in these operators so you can stay ahead, and adapt continuously till you make your strategic skills as good as the technical ones.

The Pros and Cons of AI Operators (With Real-World Scenarios)

Now itā€™s time to look at the two sides of the coin. Are these operators life-saver, or just another hype in the age of AI?

Pros

1. Low Tech Barrier: Youā€™re a manual QA with zero coding experience. Your team needs to test a new e-commerce checkout flow. Instead of waiting weeks for an automation engineer, you use an AI operator. You type: ā€œAdd a product to the cart, apply a discount code, and complete the purchase.ā€ In the ideal scenario, AI executes the test in minutes.

    • Why It Matters: You donā€™t need to be a coding wizard to automate tests. This makes automation democratic as it puts power in the hands of manual testers.

2. Flexible and Self-Healing: Your dev team renames a button from ā€œSubmitā€ to ā€œPlace Order.ā€ Traditional automation scripts can break, but your AI operator? It recognises the new button text and keeps testing like nothing happened.

    • Why It Matters: Less maintenance, fewer failures, and more time for actual testing.

3. Scalable: Your app supports 10 languages. Testing each one manually would take days. With an AI operator, you simply prompt: ā€œTest the login flow in all supported languages.ā€ The AI handles the rest.

    • Why It Matters: You can scale your testing efforts without scaling your team.

AI in QA sounds promising, but how do you make it work for real? An AI-powered Test Management System (TMS) can give you the best of both worlds.

The prime example of such TMS is aqua cloud. It handles your classic test management concerns with precision. With a centralised hub, you can combine both your manual and automated tests. aquaā€™s AI can easily automate test case generation, test data creation, and requirements generation in 3 clicks, just in a few seconds and take care of the heavy lifting. Want to take it further? You can connect aqua to your existing automation stack or link it via API to AI browser agentsā€”so you can start experimenting with AI-driven testing today. Integrations like Jira, Azure DevOps, and Capture (native one-click bug tracking solution) superpowers your QA while customisable dashboards make your software test management unbeatable. Now it is time to test the power of AI in QA for real.

Use the power of AI copilot to save 42% time on test planning stage

Try aqua cloud for free

Cons

  1. Expensive: Youā€™re testing a complex SaaS platform with hundreds of screens. At 10 cents per screen analysis, your monthly bill hits $5,000. Ouch.
    • Why It Matters: For large-scale testing, costs can spiral out of control. This means if you are a team with budget concerns, this is still out of reach.
  2. Harder to Control
    • Scenario: You ask the AI to test a search feature. Instead of typing ā€œshoes,ā€ it types ā€œshotsā€ and clicks random buttons. The test fails, and you have no idea why.
    • Why It Matters: Without clear boundaries, AI will do more harm than good.
  3. Young Tech
    • Scenario: Youā€™re testing a brand new web app with dynamic content. The AI operator might struggle to understand and interpret animations and fail to complete the test.
    • Why It Matters: AI operators are still evolving. Theyā€™re not yet ready to handle every edge case (yes, human touch is still needed here).

Best Browser-Based AI operators

Ready to dip your toes into AI-powered test automation? Here are some tools to explore:

ā€œConsider AI as an assistant. QA domain knowledge and the mindset is something more human which AI can't replicate. Try as many different tools as you can and pick the one which helps in your workflow.ā€

AlarmingSearch Posted in Reddit

1. OpenAI Operator

A browser-based AI agent that interacts with web pages autonomously. It can:

  • Fill forms
  • Navigate sites
  • Extract data

On top of it, OpenAI can perform other browser automation tasks. It is currently in development, and some early access options are available.

2. Skyvern

Skyvern is the next AI-powered autonomous browser on our list. It allows users to perform complex web-based interactions without manual scripting. With Skyvern, you can: 

  • Automate test workflows, 
  • Extract data
  • Handle other repetitive web-based tasks.

3. Browserbase Operator

Broswerbase is an AI agent to automate web tasks, including: 

  • UI testing
  • Form submission
  • Website navigation.

Itā€™s an alternative to OpenAIā€™s Operator as it allows developers to integrate autonomous web interactions.

4. Smooth Operator

It is a free browser-based AI agent. The main strengths are controlling and automating web interactions directly from a local or cloud environment. It is a great alternative to proprietary browser automation tools.

5. CognosysAI Browser

An open-source AI-powered web automation operator that enables autonomous browsing, testing, and interaction with websites. Still in early development but promising.

Browser based operators

AI-powered browser agents are promising, but what about managing, structuring, and scaling AI-driven testing? Thatā€™s where aqua takes the lead. With a centralised hub for both manual and automated testing, you have 100% traceability, test coverage and visibility. With AI-powered test case generation, test data creation, and requirements generation, you can automate in just 3 clicksā€”98% faster than manual efforts. Want seamless scaling? Integrate AI browser agents, and automation frameworks, or connect via API to expand your AI-driven testing. Now, itā€™s time to put AI-powered testing to the real test.

Do not limit yourself with niche tools; go for 100% AI-powered TMS

Try aqua cloud for free

The Bottom Line

Donā€™t know if it is good or bad news for you, but AI operators are here to stay. Theyā€™re not perfect (yet), but theyā€™re powerful. And they are going to evolve massively in the next years. For manual QAs, this is a chance to level up. For automation engineers, itā€™s a wake-up call to adapt. The question is, which route will you choose?

On this page:
See more
Speed up your releases x2 with aqua
Start for free
step
FAQ
What is browser automation testing?

Browser automation testing is using AI bots to check things on a websiteā€”just like a human would, but faster and without mistakes.

They can:

  • Fill out forms and submit them
  • Click through menus and verify if pages load correctly
  • Run tests across different browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Edge, etc.)
  • Catch bugs before real users experience them
How do I automate cross-browser testing?

You automate cross-browser testing by making a script do the boring stuff for you across different browsers. Hereā€™s how:

  • Pick a tool that does the job ā€“ Selenium (free and flexible), Playwright (fast and modern), Cypress (great for developers), or a cloud service like BrowserStack (no setup needed).
  • Write a test script once, and run it everywhere ā€“ Donā€™t test manually. Write a script in Python, JavaScript, or Java. It will simulate real user actions like clicking buttons, filling out forms, and checking the loads.
  • Run tests on multiple browsers at once ā€“ Set up your tool to test Chrome, Firefox, Edge, and Safari without you lifting a finger. Playwright and Selenium Grid can do this in parallel.
  • Use cloud testing platforms if you hate setup ā€“ BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, or LambdaTest let you test on different browsers and OS without installing anything.
  • Automate everything in CI/CD ā€“ Connect your tests to GitHub Actions, Jenkins, or GitLab so they run automatically every time you push new code.
  • Catch and fix browser-specific bugs instantly ā€“ If a test fails, check screenshots or logs to see what broke on which browser, then tweak your code to fix it.

This way, your website works everywhere without you manually opening a million tabs.

Can I use AI to create tests?

Yes, and aqua cloudā€™s AI Copilot makes it ridiculously easy. Instead of manually writing test cases, you just give it a requirementā€”which aqua can even generate for you in seconds with a simple voice promptā€”and the AI Copilot instantly turns it into a full set of test cases.

This means:

  • No more writing test cases from scratch ā€“ AI generates them in seconds.
  • No more gaps in coverage ā€“ AI suggests missing tests based on best practices.
  • No more wasted hours ā€“ You save up to 98% of your time compared to manual test creation.