Polarion alternatives
21 mins read
September 26, 2023

5 Test management tools to try instead of Polarion

Choosing the right software tool can make all the difference in QA. While Polarion offers various advantages, you might have faced a lot of challenges like a non-intuitive UI, API usage issues and just higher costs. If Polarion does not cut it for you anymore, we're here to guide you towards alternatives that not only address these concerns but also provide more advanced and even budget-friendly solutions that might better align with your needs.

Martin Koch
Nurlan Suleymanov

About Polarion

Polarion is a popular test management tool for managing all aspects of your testing process. Polarion has requirements management that enables you to trace between test cases and project requirements, ensuring thorough functionality validation and verification. With Polarion, you get the following: 

  • Requirements traceability 
  • Real-time reporting and metrics 
  • Integration with test automation tools 
  • Collaboration and communication within teams 
  • A centralised platform for managing test artefacts

Pros & cons of using Polarion

Here are the top pros and cons of using Polarion: 


  1. Comprehensive test management: Polarion is a good choice for managing requirements, tasks, and test cases in a single application, as it provides a centralised platform for efficient test management. 
  2. Customisability: Polarion’s planning functionalities and customisable workflows allow you to tailor the tool to your methodologies, needs, and goals. 
  3. Integration capabilities: The tool’s integration with various solutions with test automation and review & release functionalities, including Jenkins, Jira, and Windchill, streamlines your testing process, enhancing productivity. 
  4. Improved collaboration: With interaction between work items and LiveDocs, Polarion enables better team collaboration, enhancing communication and information sharing. 


  1. Lack of AI: Having no AI-powered features at all makes Polarion fall short in comparison with advanced tools.
  2. Weak UI: The user interface of Polarion lacks in terms of modernity and ease of use, with limited drag and drop. 
  3. Limited documentation in REST-API: Polarion lacks comprehensive documentation, leading to challenges when integrating with other tools or maximising its functionality.
  4. Save hooks: Users face challenges saving changes automatically after leaving the field, which would not happen with advanced test management solutions. 
  5. Filtering issues: Filtering items based on specific criteria within multiple documents can be cumbersome and far from user-friendly.
  6. Steep learning curve: Polarion also has a challenging learning curve due to its feature-rich nature upon older foundations. It requires time and effort to learn, do essential tasks and harness full capabilities.
  7. Limited text editing: Reportedly, the program’s text editing capabilities may be less sophisticated than what is typically available in word processing software like Microsoft Word.

“Polarion allows you to customise and implement your own agile development methodology, but when making extensions or connections with other solutions, it has certain mishaps because it has a lack of documentation"

Sandra S., Project Manager

List of 5 Polarion alternatives

So, here is the list of Polarion ALM alternatives you should know about and consider trying:

1. aqua cloud

aqua cloud is a powerful test case management tool you should consider if you are looking for a solution similar to Polarion, or even better. With aqua cloud, you can streamline your testing processes with AI-powered features and comprehensive test management functionalities. 

aqua’s key features

  • AI-driven testing that allows faster test case generation, one-click test actualisation, and efficient manual web testing. 
  • A centralised platform for development and QA teams to track progress in real time. 
  • Extended and customisable analytics and dashboards for data-driven decision-making. 
  • Traceable testing and exportable execution history for regulatory compliance. 

But why should you try aqua? Well, here is the list of pros of using aqua in case you choose this test management tool: 

  • Accelerated test case creation and manual web testing with AI capabilities
  • Enhanced regular collaboration and progress tracking with a centralised platform 
  • Accurate, data-driven decision-making with valuable insights from analytics and dashboards
  • Custom integrations with REST API allow you to access information from items or test executions, manage user administration, create test executions, automate recurring tasks via scripts, and manage large amounts of data easily
  • Regulatory compliance through comprehensive test coverage and execution history
  • Intuitive, easy-to-understand UI that will make you feel you have been using the tool for years
  • Flexible and scalable deployment options for projects of varying sizes 
  • Unique add-ons, such as a Chrome extension for faster defect recording and AI-driven automation 

No tool is perfect, so there are some potential cons of using aqua, too, including:

  • aqua doesn’t include eSignature functionality, but you can easily manage approvals using its versatile workflows. 
  • aqua offers native integrations with over 10 QA tools, and most issue trackers can be connected within just 15 minutes using REST API.

aqua tool integrations include seamless possible options and tools you will probably see in the testing process: JIRA, Ranorex, UFT, Jenkins, JMeter and many more. 

aqua cloud’s REST API conforms to Open API standards, ensuring smooth integration, quick migration, and compatibility with other tools. The comprehensive documentation, over 600 pages and continually updated, further simplifies the integration process, making it a versatile and well-connected test case management solution for diverse testing requirements.

With its AI-driven process automation, centralised test management, and regulatory compliance support, aqua is a compelling choice for you on your journey to find a powerful solution for testing efforts.

"aqua tool pretty much exceeded our expectations since it's very complete and easy to use. Even with some limitations due to the trial version, the customer service was excellent and very fast to answer every doubt or request that we had".

Dmitri P., Senior IT Consultant

If you’re eager to stop using Polarion and elevate your test management capabilities, you should consider using aqua. With aqua, you can leverage the transformative potential of AI-driven automation, supercharge your testing endeavours, maximise efficiency, foster collaboration, and deliver outstanding software products.

Transform your testing process with a click

Try aqua for free

2. IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM)

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) is also a powerful and comprehensive ALM solution catering to your varying needs. Formerly known as IBM Rational Team Concert (RTC), it is designed to support the end-to-end software and systems development process, providing a collaborative platform for you to plan, track, and manage complex development projects. 

You can confidently track version history, manage code changes, and assess the impact of modifications. ELM’s test management module plays a crucial role in ensuring software quality. The seamless environment it provides helps you efficiently plan, execute, and track tests. Additionally, comprehensive test coverage and accurate defect tracking aid in identifying and resolving issues promptly.

IBM ELM pros and cons

Regarding the pros and cons of using IBM ELM, you will see the ones below. 


  1. Comprehensive solution: ELM integrates requirements, development workflow, and test management in a single platform. 
  2. Scalability: The tool can handle large and complex development projects, making it suitable for enterprise-level organisations with extensive software development needs. 
  3. Compliance and regulatory support: ELM offers features that support compliance with industry standards and regulations, making it suitable for projects that require adherence to specific quality guidelines. 
  4. Traceability: ELM offers comprehensive traceability, allowing you to track relationships between requirements, development tasks, and test cases.


  1. Cost: ELM is an enterprise-grade solution, and its licensing and implementation costs are relatively higher than the industry average, making it less suitable for smaller companies. 
  2. Performance: Sometimes, ELM’s performance is degraded when handling extensive data and complex projects, leading to slowdowns or slower response time. 
  3. UI: Some users find the UI of ELM less intuitive and user-friendly than other modern ALM and test management tools. 
  4. Dependency on IBM Ecosystem: While ELM’s integration with other IBM tools can benefit IBM customers, it might create dependencies on the IBM ecosystem, potentially limiting interoperability with non-IBM tools.
  5. Limited third-party integrations: Although ELM provides integration with certain third-party tools, the range is more limited to DoorsNext or EWM integrations, falling short compared to the ALM solutions with larger ecosystems.

"It is a great tool to make better test management and managing Test artefacts such as Testcase script, data, results, but the preconditions make a strict flow to the user to stick on a process."

Sreekuttan S., Test automation engineer

3. VersionOne

VersionOne is the next alternative to Polarion on our list, as it is a popular Agile project management and ALM tool designed to support software development and delivery using Agile methodologies. Agile teams use it to plan, track, and manage their projects efficiently. Its adaptability to various Agile frameworks, like Scrum, SAFe, and Kanban, makes it a valuable choice for organisations embracing Agile methodologies in their testing processes. 

With VersionOne, you can seamlessly manage test backlogs, ensuring that test cases are well-defined, prioritised, and organised. The tool’s capabilities enable you to plan and execute test cycles efficiently. VersionOne helps you provide insights into test progress, coverage, and team capacity, while its visual boards and customisable views enhance test management transparency and collaboration within teams. Its interactive dashboards offer real-time metrics, enabling teams to make informed decisions about testing efficiency and areas for improvement.

VersionOne pros and cons

Below are some pros and cons of using VersionOne as an Agile project and test management tool.


  1. Agile-focused: VersionOne is designed for Agile software development, making it a great solution for teams following methodologies like Scrum, Kanban, or Scaled Agile framework. 
  2. Great UI: The tool is known for its intuitive and user-friendly interface for everyone, including non-technical stakeholders.  
  3. Strong test management capabilities: VersionOne includes robust test management features, including the creation, management, and execution of test cases and result tracking. 
  4. Traceability: VersionOne offers traceability features that link requirements, user stories, tasks, and tests, ensuring alignment between different stages of the development process and providing clear visibility into project progress. 


  1. Limited non-Agile support: Teams using traditional or hybrid methodologies rather than Agile methodologies find some features less tailored to their needs. 
  2. Steep learning curve: While VersionOne’s user interface is great, some team members still face a steep learning curve, especially those new to Agile concepts and practices. 
  3. Performance: As with the other tools on the list, when handling large projects or extensive data, VersionOne’s performance can be affected negatively. 
  4. Limited customisation: Although VersionOne offers many Agile project management and test management features, the level of customisation is not as extensive as the other ALM tools on our list.
  5. Limited integrations: While VersionOne supports integration with various development tools including Jira and reporting-analytics tools, the available integrations are more limited than other ALM solutions with larger ecosystems.

“It works fairly well in a large company where you can create different rooms for each team, and they can all track their progress on the boards, while it can be buggy and the server goes down at times."

Daniel Z., Software Quality Engineer

4. Micro Focus Quality Center (QC)

Micro Focus Quality Center (QC) is the next strong Polarion alternative on our list for its comprehensive capabilities across software development. As a reliable ALM tool, it excels in multiple areas crucial for successful project management, allowing you to define, track, and manage requirements effectively. 

The test case management feature empowers you to plan, execute, and track tests efficiently, leading to comprehensive software validation. With the defect tracking feature of Micro Focus ALM, you can identify and resolve issues promptly, ensuring software quality. 

Micro Focus has release management functionalities that facilitate the deployment process automation, ensuring a smooth release cycle. With its centralised environment, the tool promotes efficient collaboration and enhances productivity. The tool’s visibility into project status and progress allows you to make data-driven decisions, contributing to the successful delivery of high-quality software products.

Micro Focus QC pros and cons

If you choose to use Micro Focus, the following are the pros and cons you are likely to face.


  1. Comprehensive test management: Micro Focus provides a comprehensive set of features for test management, including test planning, case design, execution, defect tracking, and reporting. 
  2. Scalability: Micro Focus is designed to handle large and complex testing environments, making them suitable for enterprise-level organisations with extensive testing needs. 
  3. Support for manual and automated testing: The tool supports both manual and automated testing, allowing for different testing approaches and enabling you to choose the best-suited testing method. 
  4. Trust and reputation: With Micro Focus, you will also get safer service, as it is a well-established and reputable software company with a strong presence in the software testing and quality assurance domain. 


  1. Complexity: Micro Focus can be complex, especially in the beginning, making it crucial to invest time and effort in training and onboarding to use. 
  2. Cost: Depending on the size of your company and the features required, Micro Focus’s licensing costs can be higher than most test management solutions. The installation cost of $55,000/year before any licences certainly are among the industry’s highest.
  3. Performance: Reportedly, when handling large projects or extensive data, in some cases, Micro Focus’s performance is affected, leading to potential slowdowns or response time issues. 
  4. Limited non-Agile support: Micro Focus is primarily designed for Agile development and testing. Teams using traditional or hybrid methodologies might find some features less tailored to their needs.
  5. Versioning and updates: When using Quality Center, you may face challenges related to versioning and updates, when you need to manage or migrate your data and processes from one version of the tool to another.

"Quality Center is well suited for assigning relatively quick, simple tasks to IT resources. I do not feel it is a holistically good product in terms of retaining a knowledge base for IT areas or problems."

Chris Oros, IT Analyst

5. Targetprocess

Although Targetprocess is not primarily a dedicated test management tool, it offers test management capabilities as a part of a broader feature set. It is the last compelling alternative on our list to Polarion, offering a unique visual approach to project management. Its Agile project management capabilities enable you to plan, execute, and track tests within a framework. You can visualise the test cycle progress with customisable boards and views, quickly identifying bottlenecks and potential issues. 

Targetprocess supports the Agile frameworks, making it adaptable to various testing methodologies. Its integration with popular development and testing tools allows seamless collaboration between development and QA teams, facilitating smooth issue tracking and defect resolution. 

The tool also has extensive reporting and analytics capabilities to provide valuable insights into the testing process. It empowers you to make informed decisions and ensure the delivery of high-quality software.

Targetprocess pros and cons

In case you prefer Targetprocess over Polarion, these are the pros and cons you should know about.


  1. Strong project management capabilities: Targetprocess is designed with a strong focus on Agile project management, making it suitable for teams practising Scrum, Kanban, SAFe, and other Agile methodologies. 
  2. Customisable views: Targetprocess offers flexible and customisable views, such as boards, lists, and timelines, allowing teams to visualise their project data in a way that best suits their needs. 
  3. Collaboration and visibility: The tool’s centralised platform fosters collaboration among cross-functional teams and gives visibility into project progress. 
  4. User-friendly interface: Targetprocess is known for its user-friendly interface, making it easier to understand for non-technical stakeholders.


  1. Limited test management focus: As mentioned, Targetprocess’s primary strength lies in Agile project management. While it does offer test management capabilities, it might not be as extensive or specialised as the other dedicated tools on our list. 
  2. Steep learning curve: Despite its user-friendly interface, it is not easy to adapt when initially using Targetprocess, particularly if you are new to Agile methodologies. 
  3. Reporting limitations: While Targetprocess provides some reporting and visualisation features, teams with extensive reporting needs will find the options limited to specialised reporting tools like aqua cloud. 
  4. Test automation integration: Targetprocess’s integration with test automation tools might not be as comprehensive or mature as those of dedicated test management tools.
  5. Lack of advanced test management features: If you have sophisticated testing requirements, Targetprocess’s test management capabilities will not offer the level of advanced features found in specialised test management tools.

“Dashboards are 10x better than anything in JIRA, while road mapping is harder than it looks".

Aaron S., Software development manager

Polarion alteratives


Choosing the right tool is crucial for enhancing quality in software development. Among the Polarion alternatives, aqua cloud is your top choice. It offers AI-driven automation, centralised development, and real-time progress tracking, making it ideal for Agile teams and beyond. With diverse integration options and a flexible, scalable environment, aqua cloud simplifies test management compared to Polarion, which presents UI, API, and scalability limitations. aqua cloud’s versatile integration ensures seamless connectivity with various tools, eliminating the need for extra effort to achieve similar adaptability.

If you’re ready to elevate your test management game and harness the power of AI-driven automation, don’t miss the opportunity to try aqua cloud. Experience how it boosts your testing efforts, saves time, enhances collaboration, and helps you deliver exceptional software products.

Take the next step in your testing journey

Try aqua for free
On this page:
See more
Speed up your releases x2 with aqua
Start for free
closed icon