Software testing has come a long way in the past 30 years. Teams have gone from basic Excel spreadsheets to complex real-time collaborative test management solutions. Bug reporting is going through a similar evolution: using just text isn’t good enough. Let’s explore why and how you add media to your QA.
Here are the main advantages of using media to enhance your quality assurance:
Start with your flakiest test and enable full debug capture; you’ll likely spot patterns that screenshots alone would miss entirely.
Visual bug reporting is a major improvement to your QA workflows. If you are looking for more inspiration, look no further than our testing strategy template. It provides a customisable document with the best practices that we learned, implemented, and refined over 20 years of working with high-profile European businesses and government agencies.
Give your testing the robust structure it deserves
Bug reporting isn’t just about screenshots anymore. The best tools now grab all the technical details automatically when someone hits ‘report bug’—zero extra steps needed. You get an annotated screenshot or video plus everything developers crave: console logs, browser specs, device info, network requests, even a replay showing exactly what the user did before things went wrong.
Set up automatic data masking for sensitive fields like passwords or personal info before you start testing. This way, your team gets rich context without security headaches. Smart teams track their ‘first-response accuracy’; how often developers can act on a bug report without asking for more details. Tools with auto-capture typically see this metric jump by 60-80%. The real win is that you get no more lengthy email chains trying to recreate mysterious bugs that ‘worked fine yesterday.’
Let us start with first-generation, single-task tools before we move to a high-impact end-to-end solution.
Your best first move: pick a tool that captures DevTools data automatically rather than asking team members to remember manual steps. You’ll dodge the common mistake of incomplete reports that just ping-pong between QA and development.
Here’s where visual bug reporting really pays off – when it plugs straight into what your team already uses. You can push detailed reports directly to Jira, Asana, or TestRail with all the screenshots and technical data attached automatically. No copy-pasting between tools.
Look for a two-way sync that updates ticket status in both directions. Your QA finds a bug, files it through the visual tool, and boom – developers see it in their usual workspace.
Spend 10 minutes upfront mapping your priority levels and feature tags so everything stays consistent across systems. Teams using integrated workflows report bugs get resolved nearly twice as fast since there’s zero friction between discovery and action. This turns bug reporting from ‘another thing to remember’ into something that actually saves time.
As you can see, the ideal solution for visual bug reporting needs to be the best of two worlds. It needs to act as both a QA screenshots tool and a video capturing tool. It should have both native bug tracking and integrations with dedicated test management solutions. The best part? Such a solution already exists and enjoys active support.
Meet Capture, the ultimate tool for visualised testing. It leverages native Google Chrome’s DevTools to get network and performance information, makes data-rich and visual reporting simple for non-tech people, and adds extra functionality on top. Capture is developed by aqua cloud GmbH, a company with over 20 years of QA software development and IT consulting experience.

Capture both creates the entire bug report and makes it visual. Every test execution done with Capture will auto-generate a full log of actions with timestamps, OS & device info, cookies, and network data from Google DevTools. You can both record videos and take screenshots. The image library comes with a neat editor to crop, highlight, and even add blur where needed.
As for storage, you can download files locally, save screenshots of the QA process steps in a Capture workspace, or send everything to external tools. The current list of integrations includes Jira and aqua, an AI test management software that has been in the market for over 10 years. While the Capture bug reporting solution works independently, it truly shines when you use it with aqua.

The next-gen solution for visual bug reporting
Filing a bug report with actual results in plain text just doesn’t cut it. The more complex software gets, the more time devs will spend trying to replicate bugs based on archaic reports. Adding a screenshot is how you get at least a passable bug report.
What do you need for a modern and actionable bug report? Contextualised visuals, a timestamped breakdown of actions, device & network information. Put all these materials in a shared environment with one click to trace any issue — and you get A+ defect tracking.
Luckily, we’ve already done the hard work. The all-in-one visualised testing tool you need is Capture. You can use it alongside any TMS, and it costs €0 to get started. Using videos and screenshots in bug reports will save time and free up development resources.
Visual bug reporting to meet market demands
When writing a visual bug report, start with a clear and descriptive title summarising the issue. Provide a brief description explaining where and how the bug occurred, along with steps to reproduce it. Include screenshots or screen recordings highlighting the problem area and annotate them if necessary. Specify the environment details, such as operating system and browser version, and assess the severity and impact of the bug on the user experience. Finally, offer any additional context or information that may aid in understanding or resolving the visual bug.
A visual bug, also known as a graphical user interface (GUI) bug, is a defect in a software application’s appearance or layout. It occurs when the visual elements of the user interface, such as images, text, colours, or formatting, do not display or behave as intended. Visual bugs can include issues like misaligned elements, incorrect colours, overlapping text, or distorted images, which affect the usability, aesthetics, and overall user experience of the software. Identifying and resolving visual bugs is essential for ensuring the quality and professionalism of the software product.
It is crucial to document your QA process with visuals. Screenshots and videos simplify bug reproduction, minimise excessive communication, and verify that issues are fixed for good.
The best solutions for visual QA can not only save screenshots and videos, but create a log of actions and interact with your TMS as well. Capture is a good example: both images/videos and log of actions can be sent to Jira, added to aqua TMS tickets, or saved locally.