Picture this: you, as a QA professional, strive for real-time insights to keep your finger on the pulse of ongoing testing activities. Dashboards offer immediate, at-a-glance insights into ongoing testing progress. On the other hand, reports provide you with in-depth analysis, offering a comprehensive overview and detailed breakdown of the testing landscape. But, which one should you rely on in your day-to-day activities? Let's explore both in detail with aqua's decade-long expertise to understand where and how each can empower your testing endeavours.
A QA dashboard is an interactive visualis interface, designed to display the most crucial testing metrics at a glance. A QA dashboard is more than just a collection of figures. It’s a dynamic interface that showcases real-time data, letting you keep an eye on your testing results as they happen. Key features of such dashboards include:
Now that you know this, it makes sense to ask: which dashboards are the most popular and efficient in QA? Based on recent industry data, below are the three most commonly used dashboards among QA experts:
However, while these dashboards cater to most QA needs, you often need a more tailored approach. Adding dashboards like defect age analysis, test coverage charts, or sprint burn-down metrics to your workspace might prove beneficial.
"Dashboards are a vehicle that assists us in moving from data to insight."
While dashboards provide real-time insights, QA reports present data comprehensively and structured. A QA report is essentially a document, sometimes static, detailing the results, outcomes, and recommendations post-testing. Reports play a crucial and pivotal role in decision-making in many traditional software development lifecycles, such as the Waterfall model. They are structured, methodical, and thorough in their approach. Key features include:
Having covered the key aspects of reports, we can now delve into the various types of reports and their unique functionalities. Like dashboards, there are also different types of reports, including the following three:Ā
These QA reports are instrumental in reviewing test planning efficacy, understanding the root cause analysis of defects, evaluating team performance, and offering actionable recommendations.Ā
Considering the distinctions between reports and dashboards, you might feel inclined to pick one over the other. However, the Test Management System (TMS) brings everything together, making QA dashboards and reports work hand in hand. This combo doesn’t just make things easier to see; it helps you plan tests better, do them more systematically, and understand what needs fixing. With a TMS, you see the bigger picture of the QA process, so you can make smarter decisions, keep improving, and aim for higher quality standards.
And what if there’s a solution that provides the best of both worlds? aqua cloud is a comprehensive platform that seamlessly integrates extended reports functionality and dynamic dashboards. With aqua, you don’t have to compromise; you gain access to diverse metrics, KPIs, and export formats, empowering your QA process with unparalleled transparency and insights.Ā Experience the mix of robust reporting and interactive visualisationāembrace aqua for a holistic QA experience.
Achieve 100% transparent and insightful transparency in QA with aqua Dashboards module
At first glance, you might think dashboards and reports are interchangeable in the QA ecosystem. However, the differences become apparent when you look into the functionalities and purposes they serve. Both are vital in their own right and can be seen as complementary rather than competing. Below, you see the comparison of their distinctive attributes, clarifying when and why you should choose one over the other.
1. Data Presentation
2. Update Frequency
3. Depth of Information
4. Customisation & Interaction
5. Usage Scenario
6. Audience

While understanding the nature and features of dashboards and reports is crucial, it’s equally important to comprehend how they fit into your daily operations. Let’s break down their practical applications:
Remember, choosing between a dashboard and a report isn’t about picking the superior tool; it’s about recognising which tool aligns best with your immediate needs and technical objectives. Both have their place in the QA landscape, and their optimal utilisation can substantially elevate and most likely change your QA processes.
Let’s put you to the test. Can you identify whether you need a dashboard or a report in 8 different scenarios?
Dashboards vs Reports: Choosing the wrong one wastes time and confuses stakeholders.
Your Challenge: Face 8 real QA scenarios and decide which tool fits best.
Itās not only about differences: dashboards and reports also share similar functions and purposes, particularly in software testing and QA management. Here are some of them:Ā
While dashboards and reporting tools differ in their presentation styles and interactivity, they share commonalities in their ability to provide insights, visualise data, offer real-time monitoring, and support customisation in software testing and QA management.
Iāve used a low-tech testing dashboard before and found it met my needs quite nicely.
When diving into the realms of QA, the significance of dashboards vs reporting is undeniable. Each serves unique purposes in the QA process, from offering quick, real-time insights to presenting a detailed and structured overview of testing results. However, the key isn’t merely to understand these tools in isolation but to find an optimal solution that seamlessly integrates them.
If you’re seeking an efficient way to harness the power of dashboards and reports, aqua is designed precisely with your needs in mind. With aqua, you’re not just getting a tool but adopting a comprehensive solution. Our platform offers pre-configured reports for immediate use, ensuring you don’t miss out on crucial data points. Yet, if you desire a personalised touch, aqua’s customisable dashboards allow you to craft an interface tailored to your project or organisation’s specific needs. Its intuitive design makes even the most complex dashboard setups a breeze.
Revolutionise your reporting game with 100% transparent dashboards
A QA report is a document summarising the quality assurance activities, findings, and outcomes within a specific period. It typically includes information about test execution, defect metrics, test coverage, and any other relevant QA-related data, providing stakeholders with insights into the quality of the software being tested.
A dashboard in testing is a visual representation of key metrics and indicators related to the testing process. It provides stakeholders with a concise and easily accessible overview of test progress, test coverage, defect status, and other relevant information, facilitating quick decision-making and monitoring of testing activities.
Dashboards provide real-time visual summaries of key metrics and indicators, offering at-a-glance insights into current performance. They are highly interactive and customisable, allowing users to drill down into details. On the other hand, reports offer detailed, structured analyses of historical data and trends. They typically provide comprehensive, static information, suitable for in-depth analysis and documentation purposes.
Both dashboards and reports offer insights into data, allowing stakeholders to make informed decisions. They utilise visual elements such as charts and graphs to present information effectively. Additionally, they can be customised to meet specific needs and provide visibility into key metrics related to a particular aspect of the business or project.
A quality assurance dashboard is a visualised data that helps you track and monitor key metrics related to quality management. It is real-time tool reflecting on things like defect severity distribution, testing success rates, bug resolution times, and even end-user reported metrics that reflect customer satisfaction. The goal is to help you stay on top of project progress and quality control.
To create a QA dashboard, start by defining the key metrics that matter most to your project, like data quality, defect severity distribution, and overall quality control dashboard performance. Then, choose a tool that integrates well with your project management system, and set up visualisations that make these metrics easy to read and act on.
A KPI for quality assurance is a measurable value that shows how well you’re achieving your quality goals. Common KPIs include defect detection rate, defect severity distribution, and product quality metrics that directly impact project quality control and customer service performance.
The 4 main types of quality assurance are: